The chart below shows the total minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into 3 categories, from 1995-2002.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates minutes trends in three categories of calls in the UK during the period of 7 years between 1995 and 2002.
As can be seen from the graph, the number of local fixed line calls was at its minimum above 70 billion minutes in 1995, then it was growing modestly until reaching the peak in 1999. However, from this year onwards, the growth of call minutes was suddenly replaced by the downward trend, that reduced the number of minutes from 90 to 72 billion by 2002.
Looking through the national and international perspective, we can see the upward trend in call duration. In 1995 the amount of call minutes was equal to approximately 38 billion before increased broadly during the remainder of period. Overall, the international and national line ones closed the 2002 up to 60 billion, that just 12 billion less than on the local line. Throughout the whole period, the remaining category of call is the least popular in the UK. From the beginning to the end of the period it underwent the upward trend, increasing the number of minutes from 5 billion by almost 9 times. That correlates to 45 billion minutes by 2002
In general terms, the total number of telephone calls and its duration grew dramatically during 7 years, except the local line calls , which has accompanied with decline by the last years.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 134, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ing 7 years, except the local line calls , which has accompanied with decline by t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, look, then, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1101.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 231.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76623376623 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54413699045 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562770562771 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 318.6 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3443832303 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.333333333 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6666666667 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.44444444444 5.23603664747 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263576688969 0.215688989381 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121379793789 0.103423049105 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0524276803497 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170161480627 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0518172317757 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.