The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billion) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.
The diagram demonstrates the amount of time spent on different three categories of calls in the UK, between 1995 and 2002.
Overall, during that period, there was a dramatic jump (4x) in the use of mobile minutes, and a moderate growth in a national and international phone call consumption, while local telephone connection fell slightly.
First of all, while 4 years term started in 1995, all three trends had increased. it can be clearly seen that by 1999 the amount of time had spent on national and international fixed line was nearly 60 billions, it was six times more than mobiles . The peak of using local fixed lines was roughly 90 billions.
Secondly, according to the data, local category was losting its position with a huge decline to 70 billions. On opposite side,
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 79, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... a dramatic jump 4x in the use of mobile minutes, and a moderate growth in a nati...
^^
Line 4, column 83, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...n 1995, all three trends had increased. it can be clearly seen that by 1999 the am...
^^
Line 4, column 247, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ions, it was six times more than mobiles . The peak of using local fixed lines was...
^^
Line 6, column 127, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ecline to 70 billions. On opposite side,
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, secondly, while, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 650.0 965.302439024 67% => OK
No of words: 133.0 196.424390244 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88721804511 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.39596269041 3.73543355544 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68117202888 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.699248120301 0.547539520022 128% => OK
syllable_count: 193.5 283.868780488 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 61.0496619523 43.030603864 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.8571428571 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0971786722484 0.215688989381 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0469553907395 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.06996158132 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0727345959162 0.15604864568 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0785240293709 0.0819641961636 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.