The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart provided reveals the amount of time spent in minutes by UK residents on three different types of telephone calls between 1995 and 2002
It is evident that the local fixed line calls fluctuated markedly while the national and international fixed line and the mobile (all calls) rose during the given period, which narrowed considerably the gap between three categories.
The local fixed line calls were the highest throughout the period, rising considerably from 12 billion minutes in 1995 to a peak of just under 90 billion minutes in 1998, followed by a rapid decrease to the 1995 figure in 2002.
The national and international fixed line calls grew steadily from approximately 38 billion minutes to 61 billion minutes at the end of the provided period, though the last two years saw a slowed growth. There was s dramatic climb in the mobile calls from 2 to 46 billion millions minutes. This rise was particularly noticeable between 1999 and 2002, during this period, the use of mobile calls were merely tripled.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 67, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eals the amount of time spent in minutes by UK residents on three different types...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 865.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60154139728 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566473988439 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 22.4926829268 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 102.928324576 43.030603864 239% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 173.0 112.824112599 153% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.6 22.9334400587 151% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.8 5.23603664747 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230587197251 0.215688989381 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12713153521 0.103423049105 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0513188634716 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155137685687 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0553146729714 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.4 13.2329268293 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.43 61.2550243902 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.3012195122 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 27.5 11.4329268293 241% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.9970731707 142% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.