Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
What other measures do you think might be effective?
It is undeniable that traffic and pollution from vehicles have become controversial problems which cause extremely effect on the environment and people living standard both in the cities and on the roads every where. Talking these problem is not only the case of simply rising the price of petrol. From my point of view, I totally disagree with this opinion.
On the one hand, I think to address the pollution issue, cleaner fuels need to be developed. Nowadays, the high-technology has already available to manufacture electric cars that have many advantages such as quitter cars that use cleaner fuels such as electric or water. Convincing manufacturers and citizens adopt this new technology would be more effective solution for improving air quality and reducing the amount of emissions caused by vehicles, especially in crowded cities in all over the world where have many noise and air pollution.
On the other hand, traffic congestion also would not be solved by increasing petrol price or even changing the kind of appropriate vehicles because not everyone has a chance to alter their vehicles. However, reducing traffic congestion can be effective method by decreasing the amount of private vehicles on roads. In order to implement this method, government should have policy to encourage people choose public transport services instead of using their own cars or motorbikes. For example, if sufficient, convenient sky train or underground train are built and effectively operates, the number of vehicles on the roads would be significantly reduced.
In conclusion, I reaffirm my point of view, long-term traffic congestion and pollution reductions would not only be solved by rising petrol price. It depends on how government improve public transportation services and spend sources such as finances and human for researching alternative energy used for vehicles.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 187, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eople living standard both in the cities and on the roads every where. Talking th...
^^
Line 1, column 206, Rule ID: EVERY_WHERE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'everywhere'?
Suggestion: everywhere
...rd both in the cities and on the roads every where. Talking these problem is not only the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 227, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this problem' or 'these problems'?
Suggestion: this problem; these problems
... and on the roads every where. Talking these problem is not only the case of simply rising t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 514, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun noise seems to be countable; consider using: 'many noises'.
Suggestion: many noises
...cities in all over the world where have many noise and air pollution. On the other hand...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, for example, i think, in conclusion, kind of, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1590.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40816326531 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88544453768 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58843537415 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.0652769639 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.5 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.91666666667 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145891098623 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0581844804488 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.050171617144 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0887281654135 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0254034658786 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.