Some people say economic development is necessary to reduce the poverty in the world. Others say that economic growth should be stop immediately to stop damaging the environment. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
Economic growth has been a major priority in many parts of the world because some people believe that economic growth is the most effective way to address starvation and poverty while others claim that it would have negative impacts on the environment and should not be continued.
On the one hand, solid economic progress is crucial for tackling hunger and poverty. First, a highly developed economy means have considerable investment in agricultural sector. Successful businesses would join hands with government to support modernization and innovation of farming method and techniques. This would help enhance productivity and food security would be assured as a result. Meanwhile, economic prosperity also contribute to significantly reducing the unemployment rate. In other words, the total national outcomes increase, the enterprises would need to expand their operation, thus, creating more job opportunities and decreasing the poverty rate.
On the other hand, defining sustainable economy arise from a nation’s friendly- environmental economic progress. Industrialization coupled with economic development has resulted in ever-increasing environmental pollution. Factories pollute the air by releasing gas emissions to the atmosphere on a daily basis, sewage is being discharged into the rivers without adequate pre-treatment. Is businesses show concern in environmental friendly technology, and make optimal use of resources in order to minimize environmentally detrimental effects.
In conclusion, the above analysis point out the fact that economic development should be put on top priority in fighting poverty and food shortage and environmental drawbacks can possible be overcome if businesses have concern about this important problem.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, thus, while, in conclusion, as a result, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1515.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.0119047619 5.12529762239 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31214686124 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.666666666667 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.7647171763 49.4020404114 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.25 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247545012118 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0795834407921 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0669863569628 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155157932255 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0557555798484 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 50.2224549098 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.58 12.4159519038 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.25 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.