The chart below shows the value of one country’s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015.
The given bar graph gives information about international trade of five types of products for a particular country between 2015 and 2016. While the table illustrates the proportion of change in values for every type of exports compared to 2015.
In general, although the two highest profits for particular country came from petroleum and engineered products, the lowest income for this country was from gems and jewelry products.
In 2015, the country earned around 60 and 57 million dollars from petroleum products and engineered goods . Whilst the profit from this state is a half of petroleum products, it is just $ 31. The low-income was from textiles, it is around 27 million dollars. Turning to 2016, there was a slight increase in the income from agricultural products by 1 million. Whereas a remarkable rose occurred in engineering goods, and textiles, it is just about 5 million.
A table illustrated that the change percentage of the gems and jewelry decreased to 5.18%. This proportion was not as many as one in engineering goods, it is 8.5%. Furthermore, the highest changing rate happened in textile products, it increased by 15.24%. On the contrary, the lowest difference percentage occurred in agricultural products, it is just 0.81%
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 106, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... petroleum products and engineered goods . Whilst the profit from this state is a ...
^^
Line 3, column 186, Rule ID: CURRENCY_SPACE[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually written without any whitespace: '$31'.
Suggestion: $31
... half of petroleum products, it is just $ 31. The low-income was from textiles, it i...
^^^^
Line 4, column 359, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... agricultural products, it is just 0.81%
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, whereas, while, in general, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1050.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19801980198 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90505598051 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544554455446 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 307.8 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 1.53170731707 457% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.7848768486 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.5 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8333333333 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152319773161 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.06149376161 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.069226164389 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102805951068 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.081537951007 0.0819641961636 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.