The bar chart below shows the numbers of men and women attending various evening course at an adult education centre in year 2009. The pie chart gives information about the ages of these course participants.
Before us, we have two charts, and the bar chart provides information and measurements on four types of evening courses that men and women participate in. Moving on to the pie chart, we can see a breakdown of the percentage of age of participants from under 20 to above 50.
As a starting point, we can see that in the bar chart the women chose to take the language class the most, and showed the least interest in the sculpture class. Not only is that general point interesting, but also the men selected painting more than any other class, and we can see that the drama and sculpture classes are tied for the lowest number of men. As a final point, the pie chart shows that under 20 enrolled the least, and the over 50 took the top percentage.
Starting with the drama class, we can see that double the amount of women take this course, and with the painting class there are 30 women and 25 men, so a slight difference of 5. The sculpture class is the only one where men surpass women with 10 men and 5 women. As a final point, the women have 40 enrolled which doubles the amount of men.
Moving on to the pie chart we can see that 37% more 50+ are enrolled than the under 20 aged group. The 40-49 ages are at 26%, which is 10% more than the 30-39 group. Finally, our 20-29 ages sit right at 11%, very close to the bottom.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 16.0 5.60731707317 285% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1078.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 254.0 196.424390244 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.24409448819 4.92477711251 86% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.16754363197 2.65546596893 82% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 315.9 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 0.482926829268 1242% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1357784813 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0909090909 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.36363636364 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217287782267 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0955378044338 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.049901685756 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143199105043 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.052716114645 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.97 61.2550243902 134% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.5 10.3012195122 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.61 11.4140731707 67% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.64 8.06136585366 82% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.