The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the uk between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.
The given line chart gives information about how many tones of products were transported in Britain via four ways: road, water, rail, and pipeline between 1974 and 2002.
In general, roads used to transfer the largest amount of goods. Likewise, the pipelines transported the smallest amount during the given period.
In 1974 the roads used to transfer around 70 million tonnes which were around doubled the amount moved by trains, it was just 36 million tonnes. After 1978 the transportation by roads suffered from a significant decrease until 1982, it was just 65 million tonnes. On the contrary, the transportation by water has a sharp increase in 1982, it was 58 million tonnes from 38 million tonnes in 1974. Moreover, between 1978 and 2002 the amounts which were transferred by railway less than water and more than pipeline, this period has noticed a fluctuation, it started with transferring approximately 40 million tonnes and ended up with 42 million tonnes. The transportation by pipelines witnessed a constant amount tranport between 1994 and 2002, while transportation by roads and railways thrive roughly to 98, and 43 million tonnes respectively at the end of period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 198, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he transportation by roads suffered from a significant decrease until 1982, it wa...
^^
Line 3, column 475, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mounts which were transferred by railway less than water and more than pipeline,...
^^
Line 3, column 506, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y railway less than water and more than pipeline, this period has noticed a fluc...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, moreover, while, in general, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 994.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17708333333 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83570672653 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567708333333 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.53395225 43.030603864 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.25 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 5.23603664747 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172137394115 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0884511054364 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0647197404719 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12950498937 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0516731694073 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.