The chart below shows the value of one country’s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015.
The chart and the table give information about a country’s revenue generated from selling different types of products abroad in 2015 and 2016, and the differences in the percentage of the values of those types compared between the latter and the former year.
Overall, it seems that most categorizations’ export value in 2016 was higher compared to 2015, with petroleum products and engineered goods valued the most. The smallest change was seen for agricultural products, while the value of textiles had by far the largest change.
In 2015, the country made over 60 million dollars for selling petroleum products, which is slightly higher than that of engineered goods. Gems and jewelry was the group with the third-highest profit (about 40 million dollars), following next was agricultural products and textiles. One year later, minimal changes were seen for the value and the positions of those product categories, with agricultural and textiles products had similar figures.
With regards to the percentage change in profit of those sections corresponding to the export earnings, the most significant change was seen for textiles export, with an addition of 15.24% compared to the previous year. The next classification with the largest addition was engineered goods and petroleum products, with 8.5% and 3% respectively. Less than one percent change was seen for agricultural products. Surprisingly, gems and jewelry were the only product types with a reduction in value after a year.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 504, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... types with a reduction in value after a year.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1273.0 965.302439024 132% => OK
No of words: 234.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44017094017 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00683772831 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491452991453 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 369.0 283.868780488 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.7434014288 43.030603864 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.3 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.6 5.23603664747 31% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243877497129 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102884696704 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.077706206554 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17126049229 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0505722350977 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 11.4140731707 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.