The chart below shows the value of one country's exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015.
The given bar chart illustrates one nation’s exports categorized in five types of products, namely petroleum and agricultural products, engineered goods, gems and jewellery and textiles in the two year period, starting from 2015. Also, the table compares the change in each category of exports in 2016 to 2015. Overall, it is clear that petroleum products accounted for the highest percentage among the five types of exports in the given period, meanwhile, the opposite was true for textiles.
Regarding the bar chart, petroleum exports registered around 60 billion dollars, which was the highest figure in 2015, followed by engineered goods at just over 50 billion dollars. In the same year, gems and jewellery exports accounted for around 40 billion, while the figure for agricultural products and textiles stood at about 30 and 25 billion accordingly. Over the next year, it could be witnessed the same pattern for petroleum and engineered products, about 60% each. The figure for gems and jewellery and agricultural products was quite similar to the previous year, at around 40 and 30 billion dollars in turn. However, a clear upward trend was seen for textiles export, at approximately 30 billion.
Turning to the given table, there was an increasing pattern for most of the categories, except for gems and jewellery. petroleum and agricultural products showed a slight rise between 2 years, by 3% and 0,81% respectively. Otherwise, engineered goods increased roughly by 8,5% and textiles witnessed a significant growth of around 15%. In exception, there was a relative decrease by 5,18% in gems and jewellery exports.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 120, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Petroleum
...egories, except for gems and jewellery. petroleum and agricultural products showed a slig...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, however, if, regarding, so, well, while, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 6.8 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1379.0 965.302439024 143% => OK
No of words: 259.0 196.424390244 132% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32432432432 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83870183575 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505791505792 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 405.0 283.868780488 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.2174810603 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.916666667 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5833333333 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 5.23603664747 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163797883679 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0829561820114 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.148895087866 0.0843802449381 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124115138108 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112134736909 0.0819641961636 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.