The chart below shows the value of one country’s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart and table illustrate the amount of export revenue in 5 industries in one country from 2015 to 2016, measured in billion dollars and the changes in the proportion of each industry.
Overall, most of the categories witnessed an increase in the export earnings in 2016, except for Gems and jewellery. The two main export industries were Petroleum products and engineered goods, while the textiles industry had accounted for the highest percentage change in values (from 2015 to 2016).
In 2015, the largest highest revenue from export was to be found in Petroleum products with approximately 61 billions dollar. It was followed by Engineered good, which earned about 57 billion, however, the percentage change of the latter nearly tripled the former, 8.5% and 3% respectively, thus the export earnings of two categories were nearly similar in 2016. Although the textiles industry constituted the smallest value of, at around $26 billion in 2015, it reached over 30% in 2016 with the highest changes of in proportion, at 15.24%.
In terms of Gems and jewellery, about 43 billions dollar was earned in 2015, however, it was the only industry products that had a decrease in the export revenue of, at 5.18% to around 41 billion in 2016. Just/only 0.81% of change was seen in the agricultural products’ value in 2016, so the earnings were nearly the same in both years, at above 30 billions dollar.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The bar chart and table illustrate the a...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 136, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
... country from 2015 to 2016, measured in billion dollars and the changes in the proporti...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 206, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'textiles'' or 'textile's'?
Suggestion: textiles'; textile's
...roducts and engineered goods, while the textiles industry had accounted for the highest ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 15, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'largest the highest'.
Suggestion: largest the highest
...alues from 2015 to 2016. In 2015, the largest highest revenue from export was to be found in ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 377, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'textiles'' or 'textile's'?
Suggestion: textiles'; textile's
...re nearly similar in 2016. Although the textiles industry constituted the smallest value...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, so, thus, well, while, as to, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1182.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 235.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02978723404 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71939199127 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502127659574 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 334.8 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 37.0843632816 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.75 112.824112599 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.375 22.9334400587 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.125 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284192965031 0.215688989381 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148200271039 0.103423049105 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0565608129702 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210647549157 0.15604864568 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0582827410306 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.49 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.