The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after five years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting t

Essay topics:

The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course. The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after five years.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The figures depict different statuses of a specific class of anthropology graduates. In the pie chart, the distribution of the different lanes is shown. Then, the correspondent salaries of the working segments among them are illustrated in the table.

Putting aside the 8 percent with unknown destination, 52 per cent of the total students settled to a full-time job, nearly an absolute majority. Those who took on a part-time job were remarkably less, with only 3 in 20 students. Close to this, however, was the sum of paths involving Academia, which was almost identical to the unemployed segment.

As for 5-year experience salaries, they appear to be much more rewarding for independent consultants and state employees than for those in the private sector. That is, 8 in 10 employees working in the former fields were earning above 75 thousand dollars annually. Private employees with the same payroll, however, represented only 55 per cent, barely exceeding a half.

All things considered, the majority of anthropology graduates were likely to be employed after college. Given they have a five-year experience, the best opportunities for them would be found either in the public sector or as freelancer advisors.

Votes
Average: 9.3 (3 votes)
Essays by the user:

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, then, as for

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1031.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28717948718 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97689547018 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 106.607317073 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.692307692308 0.547539520022 126% => OK
syllable_count: 312.3 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.0093341686 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.7272727273 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7272727273 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.09090909091 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0817967381858 0.215688989381 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0308084409179 0.103423049105 30% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0338219407188 0.0843802449381 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0515054698385 0.15604864568 33% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0418598954094 0.0819641961636 51% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 40.7170731707 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.