The chart shows annual office rents in five international cities in 2008 and 2013 US square metre The table shows office vacancy rates in those cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where releva

Essay topics:

The chart shows annual office rents in five international cities in 2008 and 2013 ($US/ square metre). The table shows office vacancy rates in those cities.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Given by the whole visual are the yearly average cost of office rentals and the vacancy rates in five cities in the year of 2008 and 2013 which are demonstrated by the bar chart and the table respectively. In the brief, observation, while the annual rent measured by area showed the upward trend, the office vacancy rates shrunk as opposite.

First of all, it is apparent that four cities, namely A, B, C and E, raised the prices in the unit of USD per square metre paid for office rent up to one year in 2013 compared to 2008. One clear illustration is city B which marked the increase from under 1500 USD to more than 200 USD per year and occupied the first place from city A in 2013. Except for the similarity, can be seen in city D is that its cost witnessed a mild decline at the same period.

Turning to the figure given by the table, in spite of having expansion in the annual rental fee, the percentage of unused workplace in city A, B, C, E still slid gradually from 2008 to 2014. For instance, spare office rates declined by 2% in A with the beginning point of 6 percent and the B accounted for a mere number of 2% in 2008. Still apart from the rest, the leftover office rates in the city D not only had the contrast direction but also grew about twice as much as the one of 2008.

The combination of the bar chart and the table makes the comparison of office rental situation in five aforementioned cities between 2008 and 2013 through the annual cost and the vacancy rates, and indicates the opposite relationship of these criteria.

Votes
Average: 9.3 (4 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 336, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Still,
...ounted for a mere number of 2% in 2008. Still apart from the rest, the leftover offic...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, so, still, while, apart from, except for, for instance, first of all, in spite of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1272.0 965.302439024 132% => OK
No of words: 288.0 196.424390244 147% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.41666666667 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40649800309 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 106.607317073 143% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527777777778 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 392.4 283.868780488 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 40.052743005 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.333333333 112.824112599 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.0 22.9334400587 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 5.23603664747 210% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.346968780351 0.215688989381 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139972074671 0.103423049105 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0848585980517 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220373112011 0.15604864568 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0823988366954 0.0819641961636 101% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.92 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.95 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.