The charts below give information about the way in which water was used in differnt countries in 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features,and make comparisos where relevant.

Essay topics:

The charts below give information about the way in which water was used in differnt countries in 2000.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features,and make comparisos where relevant.

The pie chart depicts the proposition of water using over the world, while the bar chart gives figures of water use in different parts of the world in 2000. Both diagrams show the percentage of three categories: agriculture, domestic and industry with the unit of those patterns is percent (%).

Overall, almost, with 70%, water consumption of the world was used for agriculture, while there was about one-quarter was spent on industry and 8% for domestic purpose. Besides, the data show that water use in the two developing countries, China and India, is closer to the world pattern of consumption.

To be more precise, the word pattern is almost identical to that for China with only 1% less in the agriculture part and 1% more in the domestic activities, whereas India used more water (92%) for agriculture and the rest for both domestic and industry sections. In contrast, New Zealand used almost the same amount of water, nearly 45% for each, in cultivation and household use, and a slightly higher 10% was consumed by industry.

On the other hand, the pattern in Canada is almost reverse that of the world, with only the smallest proposition (8%) of water use is spent in agriculture and a massive 80% by industry. Besides, only 12% was used by the domestic sector, which was a quarter of New Zealand industrial consumption.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 84, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n of the world was used for agriculture, while there was about one-quarter was sp...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, whereas, while, in contrast, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1107.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 226.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8982300885 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68865420198 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491150442478 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 338.4 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.5086388279 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.375 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.25 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.375 5.23603664747 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15504042196 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0815306779981 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0560099690908 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112375648638 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0275581149603 0.0819641961636 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.