The charts below give information on the ages of the population of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.
The charts show the information on ages of the population of Yemen and Italy, with future projections. It is clear from the chart of Yemen is that about half the population in 2000 consists of people of the age group 0-14. Among the rest most contains people from 15-59 years old and a very little proportion of population with age more than 60 years. In the projection of 2050, the percentage of 0-14 years age group will decrease by a significant amount, which is now about 37%, whereas the proportion of 15-59 years olds is projected to increase. As seen from the chart, the percent of 60+ years old people have also increased in a small amount.
While studying the chart for Italy, we can see a different picture than that of Yemen. Here in 2000, the leading population is of the age group 15-59 years old, which is 61.6%. Unlike Yemen, the other two age groups have a significant portion of the chart, with 60+ group of 24.1%, that was very insignificant portion in Yemen. From the projection for 2050 chart, the percentage of 15-59 years old age group will face a significant decrease, which is supposed to be about 46.2% of the whole population. On the other hand, 60+ years old percentage will have a great increase, resulting them to be 42.3% of the population. The 0-14 years old age group will face a little decrease in their proportion.
Therefore, the pictures of population statistics are very different between the two countries. And the data projected also don’t match with each other.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 358, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'chart' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'charts'.
Suggestion: charts
... in Yemen. From the projection for 2050 chart, the percentage of 15-59 years old age ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, therefore, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 3.97073170732 378% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1250.0 965.302439024 129% => OK
No of words: 264.0 196.424390244 134% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73484848485 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59469143994 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.458333333333 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 358.2 283.868780488 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6157778806 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.1538461538 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3076923077 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.46153846154 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277224232413 0.215688989381 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118617809824 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0843765607313 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185118408503 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0807195346971 0.0819641961636 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.2 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.