Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computers is now replacing their functions. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The concept that public libraries are being replaced by computers is debatable. Hence arises the question whether it is viable to spend money for maintenance of public libraries. But I think public libraries still have things to offer, which demands the expenditure for its maintenance.
Public libraries have been the vanguard of spreading knowledge for centuries to enormous number of people. However, with the emergence of computers in our day-to-day life, the use of public libraries have diminished a great deal. And now people do not usually go to public libraries anymore to collect necessary information, which they can easily obtain through their computers at home. Still there are people who prefer public libraries, because it gives them a feeling of assurance and reliance. Also, public libraries contain so many priceless books that are important to preserve since they remind us of our history and the knowledge of how we got to the modern age of technology. Moreover, public libraries are a gold mines for researchers, where they can find rare books and information for their research which are not usually available on the internet.
Another reason to spend money for maintenance of public libraries is that nowadays many public libraries are going through modernization, with the introduction of computer and internet. This is a great way to revive the role of public libraries in our society. For instance, the great library of Alexandria is not digitalized and people can find any book using the high-tech computers available at the library, hence justifying the need to carry on the maintenance of public libraries.
After all, public libraries are not completely replaced by computer yet. Also, by the application of modern technology public libraries are adapting themselves, which nullifies the idea of wasting money in the maintenance of public libraries.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 81, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...ing replaced by computers is debatable. Hence arises the question whether it is viabl...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 94, Rule ID: WHETHER[5]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "the question"?
Suggestion: whether
...by computers is debatable. Hence arises the question whether it is viable to spend money for mainten...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 388, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Still,
...obtain through their computers at home. Still there are people who prefer public libr...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, moreover, so, still, after all, for instance, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1590.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31772575251 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86015170577 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505016722408 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8896337702 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.571428571 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3571428571 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282329898314 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120806599948 0.084324248473 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0607289786476 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202840554084 0.151304729494 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0287872344003 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.