The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.

Essay topics:

The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.

The table shows the number of visitors the year before and after the refurbishment of the museum. The charts show the visitor satisfaction before and after. From the table it can be seen that the number of visitors have significantly increased after the refurbishment, namely 18000.

The chart indicates that the percentage of very satisfied visitors has increased a lot, from 15% to 35%. Satisfied visitors percentage has increased after the refurbishment. As from the chart, the number of satisfied visitors was the most among the others after refurbishment. The year before the refurbishment the largest portion of the chart was comprised with dissatisfied visitors, about 40%. But after the refurbishment this proportion has fallen into just 15%.

The survey also shows that very dissatisfied visitor percentage has decreased compared to the year before refurbishment. 5% of the visitors did not respond to the survey both before and after.

So to conclude, the refurbishment indeed has had a positive effect on the overall customer satisfaction.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 895.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42424242424 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13882058646 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 81.0 106.607317073 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.490909090909 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 269.1 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.6839587257 43.030603864 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 81.3636363636 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0 22.9334400587 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.54545454545 5.23603664747 30% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.378147837684 0.215688989381 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.180486918214 0.103423049105 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120969133709 0.0843802449381 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226788135521 0.15604864568 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.140393968541 0.0819641961636 171% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.56 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.