The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.
The given three pie charts illustrate the comparisons of proportions between three nutrients including sodium, saturated fats, and added sugar, which are used in the United States and the maximum number of meals may be unsound if they are eaten too much.
Overall, it is clear that, dinner from both sodium and saturated fat, and snacks from added sugar are the maximum waste meals of three food. The least eat up food from three is breakfast.
According to the chart that, breakfast which is less eat up nutrients remained same in all types of meals at 14%, 16%, and 16% respectively. Next, the largest proportion depleted on dinner of which is huge waste compared to other nutrients at 43%. Then , dinner of saturated fat and sugar fall to 37%, and 23% waste respectively.
The other nutrient is snacks. Snacks waste of added sugar is double (42%) compared to saturated fat which is just over a fifth (21%). But, snacks of sodium decline to a minority. After this, all the nutrients waste of lunch showed a cutback from sodium to added sugar at 29%, 26%, and just under a half (19%) respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 253, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...compared to other nutrients at 43%. Then , dinner of saturated fat and sugar fall ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 910.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76439790576 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45371653342 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549738219895 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.482926829268 1035% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 62.807642847 43.030603864 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.0 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.2 5.23603664747 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183417831104 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0645632508241 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0799524310318 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122815381862 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0870499282253 0.0819641961636 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.89 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.