The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporling the main features,
and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie chart compare the proportions of sodium, saturated fat and added sugar consumed in four typical meals of American people.
It is clear that the unhealthiest meals are at dinner and snack for consuming too much sodium, saturated fat and added sugar. Breakfast is the healthiest meal compared to others.
Americans eat the large number of sodium and saturated fat at dinner accounted for 43% and 37%, respectively. Likewise, the highest consumption of added sugar is at snack numbered at 42%.
In contrast, breakfast is the healthiest meal which is only around 16% in consuming three nutrients. In case of lunch, this is less healthy than breakfast but still healthier than dinner and snack. The figure of sodium, saturated fat and added sugar at lunch is higher than that at breakfast but still lower much than the data of that at dinner and snack with 29%, 26% and 19%, respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 281, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed sugar at lunch is higher than that at breakfast but still lower much than the ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, likewise, so, still, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 746.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 151.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94039735099 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.50545371207 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62827984025 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 79.0 106.607317073 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523178807947 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 211.5 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.3565432933 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.25 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.875 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.072515823272 0.215688989381 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0435551020984 0.103423049105 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0451495079637 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0557554477621 0.15604864568 36% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0343048884308 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.