The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and the amount of time doing housework and households in one country between 1920 and 2019.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The first diagram illustrates the percentage of electrical devices namely washing machines, refrigerators, and vacuum cleaners in households from 1920-2019, while the other depicts the hours that people spend on housework per week.
Overall, the number of hours of housework fell significantly throughout the 100-year period as the popularity of all three electrical gadgets. From 1920 to 1980, no one used refrigerators at first but then the number grew rapidly to 100% that every household have at least one of them. Starting at 30%, the vacuum cleaner has shown its preference that the proportion of people having it did not decline. The other electrical appliance which is the washing machine has the highest percentage of users in 1920 and after that, it fluctuated slightly to 65%. Both vacuum cleaners and refrigerators remained at 100% from 2000, whereas the other kept rising by 10% in 2019.
There was a downtrend in the number of hours that spending on housework such as washing clothes, preparing meals, or cleaning between 1920 and 2019. In 1920, people spent 50 hours on housework per week. Then the number decreased significantly to 20 hours and in 2019 it dropped a half.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, then, whereas, while, at least, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1001.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13333333333 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79439657216 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579487179487 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.062081405 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.222222222 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11111111111 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15157754208 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0665034044406 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0376249428204 0.0843802449381 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111383019554 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00533605443529 0.0819641961636 7% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.