The line graphs information about the shifts in ownership of electricity-based items as well as the amount of housework time undertaken weekly in a 100-year frame ( 1920-2019)
It is clearly shown that, the number of washing machine, refrigerator and vacuum cleaner possessed in a household witnessed an upward trend during the period, while the the number of hours spent on household chores saw a contrary one.
Regarding the first chart, 40% of families had the washing machine, which increased slightly to 75% in 2019, in spite of a fractional drop during 1960 and 2000. The ownership of vacuum cleaner and fridge were 30% and 0% respectively in 1920. Subsequently, both of these figures climbed up considerably, and the latter has surpassed the former since 1940. Interestingly, both the washing machine and vacuum cleaner appeared in every family.
According to the second diagram, residents spend an appropriate 50 hours on housework, which steadily reduced to 20 hours in 1960. For the rest of the period, this figure nearly remained sustainably.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 163, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...me undertaken weekly in a 100-year frame 1920-2019 It is clearly shown that, t...
^^
Line 3, column 166, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...n upward trend during the period, while the the number of hours spent on household chor...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 166, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...n upward trend during the period, while the the number of hours spent on household chor...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, regarding, second, well, while, as well as, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 893.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28402366864 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9724173448 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.650887573964 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 110.867635733 43.030603864 258% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 127.571428571 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1428571429 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.42857142857 5.23603664747 180% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153458456917 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.050309994339 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0682616651492 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0924964207356 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0739306824757 0.0819641961636 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.