The charts below show the percentage of monthly household income spent on various items by two different groups in one European country

Essay topics:

The charts below show the percentage of monthly household income spent on various items by two different groups in one European country

The two pie charts depict how much disposable income ( earnings excluding house rent on purchase) is spend by low and high-income groups so similar items but in different proportions.

Firstly, regarding the low-income group, the highest proportion of their money is spent on food and drinks - 29 percent, compared to just 15 percent for the high-income group. This is closely followed by a quarter of the total proportion paid out on fuel bills, which contrasts with a much lower figure for this item for the affluent group (only 7%).

Interestingly, the most popular item for the high earners is recreation and cultural activities - around one-fifth of the total while it is half of it for the lower ones. The higher groups also spend a much higher proportion than the lower-income group on restaurants and hotels ( 12 percent and 4 percent respectively). The proportion of expenditure on clothing for the two groups is very similar, with only one percent difference between the two ( six percent for the high group people and 5 for the lower ones).

Overall, it can be seen that the major proportion of the lowers is attributed to food & drinks and fuel bills, while that of the high-income group has more balanced spending. Notably, both of these groups have the least spending on clothing with almost the same percentage.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 53, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...charts depict how much disposable income earnings excluding house rent on purchas...
^^
Line 1, column 100, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'spent'.
Suggestion: spent
...ngs excluding house rent on purchase is spend by low and high-income groups so simila...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 280, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r-income group on restaurants and hotels 12 percent and 4 percent respectively. T...
^^^
Line 5, column 448, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y one percent difference between the two six percent for the high group people an...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, regarding, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1103.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99095022624 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75219865146 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570135746606 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 322.2 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 27.2714938168 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.875 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.625 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203152257414 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0993113351657 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0576795108082 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140009382823 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.052235502302 0.0819641961636 64% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.