The charts below show the percentage of monthly household income spent on various items by two different groups in one European country.
The pie charts compare the proportion of household expenditure on 7 items, except housing rent or purchase, on a monthly basis between two different income group
In general, it can be said that people from low-income group spent most of their money on victuals, while the ones with higher income used chiefly on the miscellaneous section
As can be said that the greatest consumption percentage can be recorded on the food and drink section of the low-income group at 29% of the total income, nearly double when compared to that of high earnings group(15%). It followed by fuels bills, Those who earn less money spend more than the high-income group (24% and 7% accordingly)
On the other hand, most of the money earned by high-income class was spent on miscellaneous things (23%), whereas only 18% allocated them for the low-income earner. Then, the second-largest expense was the recreation and culture activities at 21% when that of the low-income class was merely 11%. The rate of consumption for conveyance and entertainments, including restaurant or hotel, among the high earning group was also higher than the other in the research, 16 over 9 for the former and 12 over 4 for the later. It can be said that the least significant difference between 2 groups was the clothing section, which only 1% greater inclined towards high-income
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, if, second, so, then, whereas, while, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1123.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 224.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01339285714 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82878998412 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 106.607317073 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598214285714 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 321.3 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 44.0 22.4926829268 196% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 155.796790724 43.030603864 362% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 224.6 112.824112599 199% => OK
Words per sentence: 44.8 22.9334400587 195% => OK
Discourse Markers: 17.2 5.23603664747 328% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203013181653 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0984156151651 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0790433902256 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148759106521 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.068955123129 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 24.6 13.2329268293 186% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.74 61.2550243902 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.1 10.3012195122 176% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.67 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 26.5 11.4329268293 232% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 19.6 10.9970731707 178% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.