The charts below show the percentages of time used on different activities in an American office in 1980 and 2006. Summarize the information by selectin and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The two pie charts compare the time cost of some activities when people working in office in 1980 and 2006. Obviously, computers become more importance during these decades and in 2006 the workers spend the most time in using it.
In 1980, half of the time in the office was occupied by paper documents and phones, which 20% and 30% respectively. About 20% of working hours were spent in meeting. Only 2% of office hours were spent on computer work, and the rest time were divided nearly equally by talking and other activities.
However, computer became the most popular and it occupied 30% of time in all after decades. With the increase of using computer in office, the time of using phone and paper document has both decrease, and in 2006 they dropped into 15% and 10% respectively. Also, meeting experienced a sharper decline to 6% in 2006.
Besides, a new Email activity emerged in 2006, taking up 8% of the time. And only talking activities had no effect with the time goes by, stay at the same whether in 1980 or 2006.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, however, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 862.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71038251366 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36790528205 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595628415301 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.193975357 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.2 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.6 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210201714295 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0860580263179 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0543204811828 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134852056762 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0468691386333 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.2329268293 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.