The pie charts show data on the percentage of pupils at one college in England who can speak more than one language which is not their mothe tongue.
Overall, the figure of students who can speak Spanish only is higher than that of the remaining groups in two different years. In addition, the rate of bilingual students in 2000 and 2010 is the same.
30% of English students at that university just spoke Spanish while the figure for students who spoke the same languages in 2010 was 35%, which was slightly higher than in 2000. Moreover, the proportion of people speaking another language was in the second rank in two separate years, at 15% and 20% respectively. The rate of students who just spoke English was quite high in the year 2000; however, there was an dramatical decline in 2010, precisely 10%.
In the year 2000, the rate of students who just spoke German is the same with one of pupils speaking 2 different languages, at exactly 10%. Additionally, the rates of students speaking German only in 2000 and 2010 are alike, 10%. 15% of pupils speaking more than one language in 2010 increased slightly than in 2000, 5 %.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 134, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...who spoke the same languages in 2010 was 35%, which was slightly higher than in 2...
^^
Line 3, column 412, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...gh in the year 2000; however, there was an dramatical decline in 2010, precisely 1...
^^
Line 4, column 213, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ts speaking German only in 2000 and 2010 are alike, 10%. 15% of pupils speaking m...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, second, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 936.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70351758794 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4187600129 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.477386934673 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 269.1 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.5774571881 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.0 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1111111111 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292886011838 0.215688989381 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141965271542 0.103423049105 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0399641149175 0.0843802449381 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193315023997 0.15604864568 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0348295248911 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.98 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.03 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.