The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The charts below illustrate the consumption of British students at a college in UK who know other languages meanwhile to english in 2000 and 2010. It can be clearly seen from the charts that the student proportions can speak spanish and two other languages increased while the others declined or remain steady.
According to the charts, the percentage of student who were able to speak spanish account for 30 percent in 2000 and 10 years later, this figure rose slightly to 35 percent and was largest consumption. In addition, from 2000 to 2010 saw an increase in the consumption of students who used two other languages (10% to 15%) and used another language (15% to 20%).
By contrasts, French student number dropped from 15% to 10% between 2000 and 2010 whereas Germanism students remain stable at 10%. Finally, the percentage of student who only able to speak english was stood at 10% in 2010, two time as low as the figure in 2000.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 108, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a college in UK who know other languages meanwhile to english in 2000 and 2010. I...
^^
Line 3, column 178, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'was the largest'.
Suggestion: was the largest
... figure rose slightly to 35 percent and was largest consumption. In addition, from 2000 to ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 776.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76073619632 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51064952948 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558282208589 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 210.6 283.868780488 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 24.1223732018 43.030603864 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 129.333333333 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1666666667 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330123907726 0.215688989381 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.185126460174 0.103423049105 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0791201151443 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.240302675271 0.15604864568 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0612536225225 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.