Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Countires whether or not concentrate to spend their budget for railways than roads is a hot topic for debate. although many people believe that spend money on railways is better than roads , I am convinced that we should pay more attention to roads.
A strong argument in in favour of spend money on roads is they have more function than railways.Firstly, many type of vehicles and travel on road instead of only train can travel on the railways. As a result, if we spend more budget for roads, we will improve transport service for many people in many major. Consequence, we can make people feel safety when they are on the roads and moreover, we can reduce the logistics costs so that will be useful for many companies.
Another reason is travel by roads can helps us reach everywhere especially in the urban area in the city that railways can not and we still have to travel by bus or taxi after get off the train. Thus, government should focus on the roads and spend more money to improve the facilities which help resident travel easier such as upgrade the public transport system and make them become more and more convinient for everybody or fix some problems on the roads which can be harmful for many residents.
Last but not least, the amount of money spend on roads will have more benefit than the same money pay for railways construction so it is mean railways need more money than roads to have the same result. it can be clearly seen that, to build a railways can not only lead to many complex issue but also have great prepared in order to reach the high quality so that many governments prefer to choose the roads if they can.
In conclusion, although railways have some merits but I strong argue that we should spend more money for roads because they have many advantages. Furthermore, governments and their residents should consider carefully before make decision.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
Countires whether or not concentrate to spend their budget for r...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 111, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Although
...s than roads is a hot topic for debate. although many people believe that spend money on...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 189, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...d money on railways is better than roads , I am convinced that we should pay more ...
^^
Line 3, column 19, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: in
...ttention to roads. A strong argument in in favour of spend money on roads is they ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 97, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Firstly
...s they have more function than railways.Firstly, many type of vehicles and travel on ro...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 106, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun type seems to be countable; consider using: 'many types'.
Suggestion: many types
...ve more function than railways.Firstly, many type of vehicles and travel on road instead ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 298, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun major seems to be countable; consider using: 'many majors'.
Suggestion: many majors
...ve transport service for many people in many major. Consequence, we can make people feel s...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 204, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...ney than roads to have the same result. it can be clearly seen that, to build a ra...
^^
Line 7, column 242, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a railway' or simply 'railways'?
Suggestion: a railway; railways
.... it can be clearly seen that, to build a railways can not only lead to many complex issue...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, so, still, thus, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1562.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70481927711 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43379267198 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.472891566265 0.561755894193 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.7562561457 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.0 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.1818181818 20.7667163134 145% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.63636363636 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.01903807615 179% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144260909807 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0784554502273 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0424889577367 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111385945104 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0387583746135 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.95 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.