Government should spend more money on railways than roads.
to what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Government officials should invest more funds on building railways than the roads. While I do agree that the money on railways should be increase but the roads should not be completely ignored. Each have their own pros and cons.
Railways are one of the important transportation services in every country. In metro cities most of the population prefers traveling by trains rather than going by cars or cab. Traveling by trains saves a lot of time as well as it is cheaper than booking a cab. Trains also helps in avoiding the traffic that is usually caused on roads. Trains are helpful when a person doesn’t have a car and have to travel a long distance. Hence, it is important to improve the railway tracks for the betterment of people.
On the other hand, roads are helpful when the distance is less or when you have to go to neighbourhood. Trains facilities are very limited. Not every city have metro train facility . Building a train facility takes lot of money as it requires building of multiple things such as tracks, train compartments, stations, etc. While roads requires only road building material. So, building roads takes less money than the railways. Sometimes a train network takes years to build , while building roads takes only months to build. So, building roads is as important as building railways.
Therefore, I believe that roads and railways are equally important for every city. Hence, government so spent same amount of money on railways and on roads.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 139, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'increased'?
Suggestion: increased
...ee that the money on railways should be increase but the roads should not be completely ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 231, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...red. Each have their own pros and cons. Railways are one of the important transp...
^^^^
Line 3, column 292, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing a cab. Trains also helps in avoiding the traffic that is usually caused on ro...
^^
Line 5, column 181, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...Not every city have metro train facility . Building a train facility takes lot of ...
^^
Line 5, column 386, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ly road building material. So, building roads takes less money than the railways...
^^
Line 5, column 476, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...mes a train network takes years to build , while building roads takes only months ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, so, therefore, well, while, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1240.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 251.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94023904382 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6040322433 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 176.041082164 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513944223108 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 367.2 506.74238477 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.4922504741 49.4020404114 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 65.2631578947 106.682146367 61% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.2105263158 20.7667163134 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42105263158 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123124843922 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0474169996861 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.057226852818 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113202245326 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0799786259724 0.056905535591 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.4 13.0946893788 64% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.74 50.2224549098 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.3001002004 64% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.48 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.3 8.58950901804 85% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 78.4519038076 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.