The charts show world pineapple exports by the top three pineapple producing countries in 2009 and 2019 and a breakdown of the cost to the consumer of each pineapple in 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make c

Essay topics:

The charts show world pineapple exports by the top three pineapple-producing countries in 2009 and 2019, and a breakdown of the cost to the consumer of each pineapple in 2019.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.

The given bar graph and pie chart demonstrate the exported metric tonnes of pineapple upon the 3 top producing nations within 10 years from 2009 to 2019, and the impairment of the expenditures consume on each pineapple in 2019. Overall, country A had the highest proportion of pineapple export in 2019 and the distribution and retail sector occupied a chunk of the cost proportion in the same year.

With regard to pineapple exports, country A accounted for more than 10 millions metric tonnes, which was the highest figure above 3 countries. However, this figure stood at a much lower number, about 1 million in the past 10 years. On the contrary, country B witnessed a start at just over 4 million and appeared to have a downward pattern to nearly 2 million in 2019. The most remarkable thing that can be seen from country C was the lowest number emerged through the given timeframe, just over 0 mil in the decade.

It can be observed from the pie chart is the large percentage of distribution and retail sector, at exactly 35%. It can be seen from the chart that the taxes and profit accounted for nearly similar proportion, at 16% and 18% respectively. same to those 2 figures, the international transport and import licenses had the 2% distance, the former stood at 12% and the latter stood at one-tenth. The last two smallest proportions were from producer and export costs, accounted for 5% and 4% discretely.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 499, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'mil' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'mils'.
Suggestion: mils
...hrough the given timeframe, just over 0 mil in the decade. It can be observed ...
^^^
Line 7, column 240, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Same
...roportion, at 16% and 18% respectively. same to those 2 figures, the international t...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, on the contrary, with regard to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1181.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 246.0 196.424390244 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80081300813 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73034288902 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 106.607317073 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569105691057 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 338.4 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.8082871104 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.1 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22255898198 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0855360185913 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111973720074 0.0843802449381 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172291938178 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.159050040085 0.0819641961636 194% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.