The charts summarise the weight measurements of people living in Charlestown in 1955 and 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The charts illustrate the weight measurement of peoples living in the charlestown over the tow at different times of period, 1955 and 2015.
The first chart shows, over 70% of 20-29 age groups of people are healthy. And also this numbers was quite similar at 1955 as well. However the numbers of overweight population of the city was maturity between 30-39 year old peoples, where 30% people was overweight in 2015. Meanwhile, this figure has slight lower at 25% at the end of 1955.
On the other hand, over aged population has underweight problem in 1955, Where 65% underweight population was aged between 60 -69. However, these proportion was dramatically decreased in 2015, were only 10% of underweight aged population. Meanwhile, the figure of obese was in increasing trend with rise of age. Aged over 40 -50 this numbers are around 21% but this figure rose staidly at 60 % whose 60-69 years old at the end of 2015. Although, the numbers of obese population in 1955 was minimum, where only 10% of 40-49 age range people gaining obese at that time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 133, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...bers was quite similar at 1955 as well. However the numbers of overweight population of...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 568, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ange people gaining obese at that time.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, well, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 874.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82872928177 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54012599444 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558011049724 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.8056598737 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.4 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140144673711 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0687733728222 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0789257643273 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15265480321 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101844745221 0.0819641961636 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.15 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.