The charts summarise the weight measurements of people living in Charlestown in 1955 and 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The first chart illustrates the weight assessment of inhabitants of Charles Town in 2015. In the second chart shows the weight assessment of Charles Town's inhabitant in 1955.
In the age range of 20-29, the underweight people accounts for 20% in 2015. However, the ideal weight gains about 70% of all. On the one hand, the percentage of of underweight and ideal are fluctuated over the range of 30-39 to 60-69 and tend to decrease. On the other hand, the overweight and obese groups are increasing rapidly and take over 80% in the age of 60-69.
Otherwise, the ideal and underweight groups amount to over 95% of inhabitant of the age range 20-29 in 1955. The overweight and obese groups tend to increase mildly by 10-20% in the age range of 30-39 to 60-69. However, comparing to the group of 20-29 the underweight percentage of 60-69 increased by 10%. The difference between of two charts is the obese and overweight group of 2015 tend to increase significantly to the group in 1955.
In general, the charts depict the differences in increasing and decreasing percentage of four type of weight in 1955 and 2015.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 159, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: of
...of all. On the one hand, the percentage of of underweight and ideal are fluctuated ov...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 928.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80829015544 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71682493891 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 79.0 106.607317073 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.40932642487 0.547539520022 75% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.980363868 43.030603864 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 84.3636363636 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5454545455 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.18181818182 5.23603664747 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108918712554 0.215688989381 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0576816731218 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0544789322871 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0938235963303 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0491158054377 0.0819641961636 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.32 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.44 8.06136585366 80% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 40.7170731707 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.