The charts summarise the weight measurements of people living in Charlestown in 1955 and 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The charts provide the analysis of the weight issues of inhabitant of Charlestown in 1955 and 2015.
In the age range of 20-29, the underweight people accounts for 20% in 2015. However, the ideal weight gains about 70% of all. On the one hand, the percentage of underweight and ideal are fluctuated over the range of 30-39 to 60-69 and tend to decrease. On the other hand, the overweight and obese groups are increasing rapidly and take over 80% in the age of 60-69.
Otherwise, the ideal and underweight groups amount to over 95% of inhabitant of the age range 20-29 in 1955. The overweight and obese groups tend to increase mildly by 10-20% in the age range of 30-39 to 60-69. However, comparing to the group of 20-29 the underweight percentage of 60-69 increased by 10%. The difference between of two charts is the obese and overweight group of 2015 tend to increase much to the group in 1955.
In general, the charts depict the differences in increasing and decreasing percentage of four type of weight in 1955 and 2015.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-09 | Kien Vu | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-11 | cindycornelia98 | 78 | view |
| 2019-09-18 | skan | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-26 | fachryadul92 | 61 | view |
| 2019-08-13 | fachryadul92 | 67 | view |
- The charts below show the reasons why people travel to work by bicycle or by car.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The charts summarise the weight measurements of people living in Charlestown in 1955 and 2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The charts summarise the weight measurements of people living in Charlestown in 1955 and 2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The graph and table below give informatio about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries. 73
- The charts summarise the weight measurements of people living in Charlestown in 1955 and 2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 855.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72375690608 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62096326368 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 73.0 106.607317073 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.403314917127 0.547539520022 74% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 236.7 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.0078247559 43.030603864 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 85.5 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2 5.23603664747 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107916773713 0.215688989381 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0613845504871 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0728486865591 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116568019404 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0776144924756 0.0819641961636 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.2329268293 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.8 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.54 8.06136585366 81% => OK
difficult_words: 23.0 40.7170731707 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.