The diagram below shows the process from Australian Bureau of Meteorology of collecting up-to-minute information for the purpose of producting reliable weather forecasts.
Describe the process in detail.
The diagram illustrates the multi-stage process of collecting immediate information for the purpose of producing trustworthy weather forecasts from the Australian Bureau of Meteorology.
Overall, it can be seen that the whole process can be roughly divided into two stages. The first stage is receiving information, analysing and forecasting while the second stage is broadcasting the information.
Firstly, as displayed in the chart, there are three different types of information transmitting devices: satellite, radar and drifting buoy. The first two work independently to produce information forecasts in the form of images including satellite photo and radar screen. However, the last type of information, which is the synoptic chart, has to be produced by all three devices.
Secondly, the next stage is to convert the forecast into different kinds of announcement. This is done through gathering forecasted information into one main computer server, then preparing to broadcast it onto three different channels: TV newsreader, radio and telephone. While TV and radio are known to be places where the audience can get the information on demand, the telephone can help people have access to urgent, up-to-minute information in a timely manner.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 448, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a timely manner" with adverb for "timely"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ess to urgent, up-to-minute information in a timely manner.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, then, while, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1069.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.65608465608 4.92477711251 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13001312575 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634920634921 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 329.4 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6583643705 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.777777778 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.22222222222 5.23603664747 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162384312386 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0669106208873 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113396571568 0.0843802449381 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128495629566 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.144893700631 0.0819641961636 177% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 61.2550243902 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 11.4140731707 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.02 8.06136585366 124% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 40.7170731707 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.