The diagrams below show changes in Felixstone in the UK between 1967 and 2001.
The visuals elucidate the transformation regarding the overall layout of an area called Felixstone in the UK, including the transportation infrastructure, accommodation system and facilities network which were partially configured from 1967 to 2011.
Overall, the whole area was modified in complexity with some new additional features being added, including the clearance of farmland, which is in favor of residents and tourists. Additionally, the whole area was modernized to be more space-effective and commercialized.
Previously in 1967, there was farmland occupying to the east of the area; however, this agricultural site was under clearance to make way for the construction of a hotel and two other sports facilities, including a swimming pool and two tennis courts. Moreover, the shops located to the northern sector of the area were contracted and thereafter converted into apartments, satisfying the need for urbanization. In the southeast side of Felixstone, there used to be a fish market, however, this site was demolished to make way for the erection of a private beach.
The development of the region saw a construction of wind turbines occurring at the southwest corner, facilitating the generation of alternative resources. Furthermore, there was a relocation of both the Cafe and Hotel to make way for a nearby car park. Complete transformation was witnessed in the seafront of Felixstone where a large marina and pier were knocked down and replaced by a public beach. The remaining infrastructure including the Golf course, dunes and a patch of vegetation remained unchanged over the examined period.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, moreover, regarding, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 3.97073170732 353% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1375.0 965.302439024 142% => OK
No of words: 251.0 196.424390244 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4780876494 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.36493750312 2.65546596893 127% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 106.607317073 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585657370518 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 283.868780488 153% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.4777621891 43.030603864 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.5 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.9 5.23603664747 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0525521431765 0.215688989381 24% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.018873341324 0.103423049105 18% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0351448874024 0.0843802449381 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0388381549543 0.15604864568 25% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0443439983024 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 61.2550243902 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 11.4140731707 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.97 8.06136585366 124% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 40.7170731707 199% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 11.4329268293 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.