Nowadays, it is not only large companies that are able to make films as digital technology enables anyone to produce films. Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
Some people hold a firm belief that not only are large corporations able to produce movies but also everyone can make a film due to the advancement of digital technology. From my perspective, although there are both favorable and detrimental impacts associated with this tendency, I personally feel that it borders on being a more harmful than beneficial development in the long term.
On the one hand, the possibility of manufacturing films for anyone thanks to the assistance of advanced technical devices is a welcome development for various reasons. The key benefit is that it is very beneficial for the entertainment market if movie producers are various. This is because they can develop their own innovation and creativity in every product, as a result, better meet the entertainment demands of each viewer. Moreover, the participation of more freelancers into this field contributes remarkably to the job market. In other words, more jobs related to manufacturing movies will be offered to more freelancers which will do wonders for the society in terms of resolving unemployment.
On the other hand, in spite of the convenience given above, I believe the involvement of more people in the production of films with the assistance of technology renders more detrimental effects. Firstly, the insurance of film quality is possibly decreased due to the fact that anyone, whether they are skilled or not, can participate in movie production. As a matter of fact, there has been reports pointing out that a numerous number of sexual and violent films with no meaningful message and artistic values are made by untrained film producers. Consequently, this will take its toll on the young generation, indicated by the increasing number of physical violence and bullying at school caused by students trying to imitate what they have been shown in movies.
In conclusion, although the tendency of making films for anyone who wants to engage in exert tremendous benefits, I think that the negative consequences that this phenomenon brings are far more significant.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, i think, in conclusion, as a matter of fact, as a result, in other words, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1742.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24698795181 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02702301624 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605421686747 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 554.4 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 35.3820418982 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.166666667 106.682146367 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.6666666667 20.7667163134 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.5833333333 7.06120827912 192% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249501104205 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0825291996795 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0667139668488 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154609856872 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0443504112087 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.