Ecotourism is now defined as a new form of travel to natural areas and many governments are encouraging ecotourism. Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
Some individuals believe that green tourism has been a new form of travel and is fostered by many governments. From my perspective, although there are both favourable and detrimental impacts associated with this tendency, I personally feel that it borders on being a more harmful than beneficial development in the long term.
On the one hand, the encouragement of sustainable tourism by governments is a welcome development for various reasons. The key benefit is that green tourism gives rise to the construction of many national parks or wildlife preserves. This helps protect many species from being in danger of extinction and at the same time, tourists can still see animals play in their natural habitats. Furthermore, sustainable tourism can help reduce our carbon footprint. For example, commuting when travelling is unavoidable, but in eco tours, tourists go by hybrid bus, or by animals, or even on foot, which helps to reduce the amount of carbon dioxide emission.
On the other hand, in spite of the convenience given above, I believe this tendency renders more detrimental effects on the environment and the local residents. Initially, more tourists coming to this area could exert dire consequences on pristine beauty of nature. This is because in order to attract more sightseers, areas once were pristine are now filled with excessive building of tourism-based facilities and infrastructure from tourist-oriented activities. Additionally, the arrival of many travelers from different cultures could take its toll on the local traditions and customs. In some cases, indigenous residents may copy the lifestyle brought by globetrotters, which results in the loss of native culture.
In conclusion, although green tourism can exert tremendous benefits, I think that the negative consequences that this phenomenon brings are far more significant.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, may, so, still, for example, i think, in conclusion, in some cases, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1583.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49652777778 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13980866256 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618055555556 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1724095021 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.769230769 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1538461538 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.23076923077 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17793072497 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0583816559063 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0409188065269 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102060404376 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.01464524235 0.056905535591 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.