The diagrams show the cross-sections of two tunnels, one joining France and Italy and the other joining two Japanese islands.
The diagrams illustrate the cross-sections of two tunnels. The first one is between two countries: France and Italy, and the second one is between two Japanese islands: Hokkaido and Japanese.
Overall, Seikan Railway Tunnel in Japan was constructed under the sea whereas Mont-Blac Road Tunnel was built under a mountain. The tunnel in Japan is longer than took more time to complete than the other one.
It took 42 years to build 53.85 km Seikan Railway Tunnel compared to 8 years of the construction of Mont-Blac Road Tunnel, which spreads 11.6 km, roughly five times shorter than the tunnel in Japan.
While the tunnel joining France and Italy was built 3.5 km under the top of the mountain, the depth of Seikan Railway Tunnel is 240 m from sea level. The Mont-Blac Road is a straight tunnel connecting two countries, whereas Seikan Railway Tunnel has steeper lines at the two ends.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, second, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 33.7804878049 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 749.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 151.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96026490066 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.50545371207 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47662640449 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 83.0 106.607317073 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549668874172 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 204.3 283.868780488 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.1019171603 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.0 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5714285714 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.14285714286 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229476774002 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144301663151 0.103423049105 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.144883233567 0.0843802449381 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161407334435 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.179577452276 0.0819641961636 219% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.