In countries where there is high unemployment, most pupils should be offered only primary education. There is no point in offering secondary education to those who will have no hope of finding a job. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that in countries with a high unemployment rate, secondary education should only be offered to promising pupils, and those who are not qualified should only complete primary school. In my opinion, I totally disagree with this point of view.
It seems to me that it does not make sense when pushing a large number of children out of school when they are still so nascent. If children do not go to school, there are high chances that they will end up forced to work or maybe even turn to a career of crime, considering the high unemployment rate. This kind of situation may also worsen the economic and social disputes when such children with no steady education background grow up and enter the workforce. Governments should consider that this in the chance to focus on building up human resource, those who will contribute to the development of the country.
In addition, primary school children are still in their age of absurdity and have not fully expressed their potential. It is likely that gifted pupils would be left out and miss the opportunity to fulfill their academic achievement. Only offering secondary schools for the most talented children would also show a lack of encouragement and faith in youngsters. Instead, all children should have a chance to finish high school or be directed to vocational training if they show their talent in those fields.
In conclusion, even though the economy is facing difficulties, governments should never give up on education, especially on children – the shaper of the nation’s tomorrow.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 57, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...hat it does not make sense when pushing a large number of children out of school when they are st...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, second, so, still, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1316.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04214559387 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7803476024 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570881226054 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 396.0 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.9630204929 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.636363636 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7272727273 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.09090909091 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249438050068 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0898736499174 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0794683148962 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147643049392 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0960440460606 0.056905535591 169% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.