The first shows how the energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which results from its energy use.
The two pie charts elucidate the information on the average usage of the energy by the Australian household and the emission of greenhouse gases from its use.
Overall, it is depicted that usage of energy by the household for heating occupied a majority part of its proportion and releases less proportion of gases into the air whereas, the refrigeration sector had experienced drastic spurge in emissions of greenhouse gases.
In detail, the power used by the people in Australia for heating their foods had counted for over two-fifths of the total proportion, while the percentage of gases obtained from it made up only 15%. Similarly, other appliance parts utilized energy to a value of about 28%. However, the toxicities generated from this plunged close to 10%. In the same way, the power extracted from using lights and cooling the equipment was 8% and 3%, and the ratio of gases produced from these shares fell to 4% and 2% respectively.
In contrast, the energy used to preserve the food by the citizens had jumped from a mere 7% to an impressive 14% of harmful gaseous substances into the atmosphere. That is, it doubled its proportion.
Moreover, the amount of energy used for heating the water had seen a slight hike from 30% in usage to 32% in emissions by the people in the nation.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, similarly, whereas, while, in contrast, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1076.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82511210762 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70450062564 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565022421525 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 340.2 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.7961741687 43.030603864 160% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.555555556 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7777777778 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 5.23603664747 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30848890719 0.215688989381 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1306700526 0.103423049105 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110352038706 0.0843802449381 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199906663735 0.15604864568 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.1107973908 0.0819641961636 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 40.7170731707 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.