The given graph shows the consumption of fast food in the UK (per week) from 1970 to 1990.
The graph illustrates the amount of fast food consumed on a weekly basic between 1970 and 1990 in United Kingdom.
It is clear from the graph that while the consumption of hamburger and fish and chips increased, there was a decline in pizza consumption.
Between 1973 and 1980, there was a slightly increase in the amount of hamburger sold, to approximately 100 grams. Fish and chips shared the same pattern, which grown from 100 grams to 150 grams. Meanwhile, the number of pizza consumed decreased by 100 grams to 200 grams.
The following twenty years saw a sharply increase in hamburger consumption, which is up to 500 grams. Fish and chips also had a considerable increase, from 100 grams to 300 grams. By contrast the amount of pizza consumed remained the same.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 34, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('slightly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('increase') instead of another adjective.
...ion. Between 1973 and 1980, there was a slightly increase in the amount of hamburger sold, to app...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 32, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('sharply') instead an adjective, or a noun ('increase') instead of another adjective.
...grams. The following twenty years saw a sharply increase in hamburger consumption, which is up t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 642.0 965.302439024 67% => OK
No of words: 132.0 196.424390244 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86363636364 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.38956122427 3.73543355544 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66497665111 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 72.0 106.607317073 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 173.7 283.868780488 61% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.3358660212 43.030603864 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 80.25 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.875 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149386746888 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0683663162426 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104527600833 0.0843802449381 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126448742342 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120411713027 0.0819641961636 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.62 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.61 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.