The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries.
The graph depicts the amount of water that was used for agriculture, industrial and homes around the world from 1900 to 2000 while the table compares the amount of water used in Brazil and the Democratic Republic of Congo(D.R.C) in 2000.
It is clear that, in general, global water needs rose significantly between 1900 and 2000, and the enormous amount of water was used for agricultural purpose. Besides, water consumption was considerably higher in Brazil than in the D.R.C.
To specify, in 1900, around 500 km3 of water was used by the agriculture sector worldwide, and the amount of water used for this purpose increased continuously during the ninetieth century and reached a peak by 3000 km3 at the end of the period. The figures for industrial and domestic water consumption were both negligible at the beginning of the period, with approximately 100 km3 and 50 km3 respectively, and they remained minimal until mid-century. However, from 1950 onwards, the industrial use overgrew to just over 1000 km3, while the domestic use went up more slowly to only 300 km3, both far below the levels of consumption by agriculture.
As the information in the table is concerned, it can be seen that a vast amount of water was used in agriculture in Brazil, and this is reflected in the figures consumption per person: 359 m3 compared with 8 m3 in the Congo. This could be explained by the fact that Brazil has 265 times more irrigated land than the Congo. Furthermore, with a population of 176 million, the patterns for Brazil indicate how agriculture water consumption can be used in some countries.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 224, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: R
...l and the Democratic Republic of CongoD.R.C in 2000. It is clear that, in gen...
^
Line 1, column 226, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: C
...and the Democratic Republic of CongoD.R.C in 2000. It is clear that, in gener...
^
Line 3, column 239, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ably higher in Brazil than in the D.R.C. To specify, in 1900, around 500 km3 of w...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 409, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...imately 100 km3 and 50 km3 respectively, and they remained minimal until mid-cent...
^^
Line 7, column 154, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'figures'' or 'figure's'?
Suggestion: figures'; figure's
...in Brazil, and this is reflected in the figures consumption per person: 359 m3 compared...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, furthermore, however, if, so, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1340.0 965.302439024 139% => OK
No of words: 271.0 196.424390244 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94464944649 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85244864694 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 106.607317073 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516605166052 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 399.6 283.868780488 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.2183831446 43.030603864 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 167.5 112.824112599 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.875 22.9334400587 148% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291586182199 0.215688989381 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137873267257 0.103423049105 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0670970213266 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191821533424 0.15604864568 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0189567870646 0.0819641961636 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 13.2329268293 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.44 61.2550243902 76% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.3012195122 146% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 40.7170731707 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.0658536585 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.