Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss bot view and give your own opinion.
We are in the technology era, so it is not difficult for people to share and take information thanks to computers and the internet. However, the question of whether we public widely new researches and new results in various fields remains controversial. While some people argue that it is preferable to publicize the latest achievements such that all others access easily, I personally believe that this kind of information needs to remain exclusive.
On the one hand, it is cannot be denied that sharing information brings uncountable advantages. It saves not only time, money, but also people's energy. Scientists cannot work individually, and furthermore, they need the collaboration. For instance, to find the complexity of an algorithm, mathematicians have to use the notations and well-known results from previous generations. That explains why scientific researchers, the academic world in general, need journals and conferences to public their research findings. Technologically speaking, some IT companies made public their codes without any conditions to show their technological excellence, as well as a customer development policy. They welcome all feedback from the customers and competitors to increase the product quality significantly. Many surveys have shown that a majority of technology mistakes have fixed by amateurs or unprofessional engineers.
On the other hand, there are some people, including myself, who are reluctant to share knowledge widely with others. When it comes to business, some key features which are related to functions or designs of a new product are valuable assets. If all information relating to it was disclosed to the public in advance, competitors could easily to copy and imitate its distinctive features. Consequently, the company's income is reduced enormously. Scientifically speaking, researchers spend a deal of time, even their entire life, to study and investigate their research fields or perhaps to solve only one open problem. Therefore, their achievements should be provided with sufficient rewards. Using journals or conferences to public papers, in fact, is considered as one way of copyright and a valid citation. Finally, publicising only a part of works is a mystery since it stimulates people's curiosity and challenges people's potential. For example, Pierre de Fermat, a French mathematician, who is known as the father of arithmetic wrote a theorem in a margin, and he claimed that he had a proof that was too large to fit the margin. Many mathematicians made an effort to solve this problem, and only after 350 years, the first successfull proof was released. The secret is a beautiful factor in science.
In conclusion, although there is no doubt that sharing ideas and information has many benefits for people, it is not fair for people who spend all the time and energy to create new products or researches that were asked to share their products information freely.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 142, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
...to computers and the internet. However, the question of whether we public widely new researches and new...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, well, while, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, in general, kind of, no doubt, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2488.0 1615.20841683 154% => OK
No of words: 461.0 315.596192385 146% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39696312364 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63367139033 4.20363070211 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14249553823 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 262.0 176.041082164 149% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568329718004 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 783.0 506.74238477 155% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.7103519664 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.173913043 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0434782609 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.26086956522 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223828677934 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0517247621423 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0565494242514 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143073751425 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0318075754719 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 143.0 78.4519038076 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.