The graph and table below give information on water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph illustrates global water usage over 100 years (from 1900-2000 on a 10 year interval) in three sectors namely agriculture, industrial and domestic. The table gives information on annual water consumption of 2000 in Brazil and Congo.
In the graph, the three sectors follow a same consistent increasing trend and of them agriculture consumes water with a higher margin than other two sectors. Both agriculture and industrial use curve rises sharply after 1950 whereas domestic usage steeps up comparatively slowly. From the table, we can compare water usage per population between the two mentioned countries.
In 2000, agricultural activities around the globe uses 3000 km3 water which is approximately 3 times higher than industrial usage and 10 times higher than domestic usage. There was a less demand of water at the very beginning of the twentieth century for industrial and domestic purposes which gradually increases to a level of 1000 km3 at the end for industrial use while agriculture remains in the upper level of the graph throughout the century.
The table compares water consumption between Brazil and Congo based on population and area. In Brazil, water usage per million of people is more than 2 m3/million in contrast this ration is slightly higher than 1 m3/million of people in Congo. On the other hand, the ratio of water volume to land area is approximately 5 times greater for Congo than Brazil.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
whereas, while, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1201.0 965.302439024 124% => OK
No of words: 233.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15450643777 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78062571848 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557939914163 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 368.1 283.868780488 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.8549904837 43.030603864 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.1 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194738333964 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0968998173125 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0756060830249 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126769257955 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0457303712881 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 40.7170731707 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.