The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
A glance at the graph reveals the information about the modification in the birth rates of China and the USA during the years 1920 and 2000.
We can clearly see that before the sharp increase in 1935, fertility in China fluctuated at somewhere between 10 to 13 Interestingly, in 1950 China reached it is climax point with 20%, before decreasing to 8% in 1955. After that, fertility of China had been steadily decreased and reached to 3%.
Birth rates was fluctuated between 12 to 14 percent in the years 1920 to 1940, as for the USA. After that, it faced with considerable decline in 1945 that reached to 5%, before it is zenith point in 1950 with 15% of fertility. Moreover, it slightly decreased in the next decades. Thus, the lowest point of birth rate in the USA was 7%.
Overall, the graph provide a clear comparison of birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000. Initially, birth rates of both countries had been fluctuated during the years 1920 and 2000. It is interesting to note that, in 1945 fertility in both countries intersected and reached 5%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 135, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...omewhere between 10 to 13 Interestingly, in 1950 China reached it is climax point...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, thus, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 883.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64736842105 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58431771672 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.473684210526 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.9865197639 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.3 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269451373613 0.215688989381 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127845020216 0.103423049105 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130691957983 0.0843802449381 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19436157877 0.15604864568 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0944353016317 0.0819641961636 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.4 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.