The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and making comparisons where relevant.
The line graphs compares different sources providing for the energy consumption in the USA since 1980 with predictions until 2030.
In general, it can be seen that there has always been a huge gap between fossil fuels and renewable sources. Also, while the energy consumption of all types of fuels has experienced a net rise, that of hydropower seems to have not changed so much. These trends are also predicted to continue until 2030.
In details, the figure for petrol and oil fluctuated in the first 15 years, before going on a linear rise to 40 quadrillion units in 2005. The upward trend has continued, but more gently until 2020, when the figure is predicted to soar to peak at 50 quadrillion units in 2030. Coal and natural gas started at 20 and around 16 quadrillion units, respectively, and rose to the 25 quadrillion mark between 2010 and 2015. However, while the figure for the former is predicted to continue to rise, that for latter is expected to level off.
All three types of renewable energy initially supplied around 5 quadrillion units each. However, while nuclear and solar/wind energy have provided increasing more energy throughout the years and are expected to continue the moderate rise in the future, the figure for hydropower, despite having gone through fluctuations, is expected to remain the same.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1115.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65600350187 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582959641256 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 335.7 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.6104640553 43.030603864 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.5 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 5.23603664747 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.102896253502 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0489516917448 0.103423049105 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0745566883428 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0951593317974 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0963752646212 0.0819641961636 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.