The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030.
The line graph illustrate the information about six types of fossil fuels and renewable energy sources in the USA from 1980 to 2008, date of the report and the prospective trend deduced from then to 2030.
Overall, it is clear that fossil fuels have been the dominant type for accounting the largest proportion of energy consumption from 1980 to tend to be more popular in the future. On the other hand, the renewable resources of energy remains comparatively stable.
A more detailed look at the graph reveals that despite some fluctuation in the first 15 years, petro and oil suffered a steady rise in use and is predicted to reach 50 quadrillion units, which will be the apex of the given period, in 2030. In 1980, natural gas came second and coal came third. However, after the unstable trend, coal is predicted to overtook natural gas - which remains relatively constant around 25 quadrillion units - in the year of 2015.
Nuclear, solar/wind and hydropower started at approximately 4 quadrillion in 1980. While nuclear constantly experienced moderate growth up to 8 quadrillion in 2030, solar/wind and hydropower fluctuate into two separated directions, upward for solar/wind and downward for hydropower. In general, these three types of energy sources are less significant and surpassed by fossil fuels, at least until 2030 according to the graph.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 136, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r constantly experienced moderate growth up to 8 quadrillion in 2030, solar/wind ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, look, second, so, then, third, while, at least, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1141.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1628959276 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82296879335 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 106.607317073 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628959276018 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 340.2 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.5456668786 43.030603864 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.777777778 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5555555556 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7777777778 5.23603664747 206% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238643905011 0.215688989381 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0906018272627 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104445975839 0.0843802449381 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157052044353 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121770486512 0.0819641961636 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 40.7170731707 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.