The graph below gives information about U.S. government spending on research between 1980 and 2008
The line graph illustrates the amount of money spent on Health, Space, Energy, General Science and Other areas by the U.S. regime from 1980 to 2008.
It can be clearly seen that the government spent the largest amount of money on Health and the least amount of money on General Science.
Starting at about $7 billion in 1980, the government expenditure on research into Health slightly dropped down over the next four years before continually climbing again to a peak of over $20 billion in 2004. Despite declining down to approximately $17 billion, the expenditure into Health was by far the highest. General Science was spent the lowest amount of money among all of these fields, beginning at $2.5 billion in 1980 and rising to just over $5 billion by 2008.
Meanwhile, there was also an increase amount of money on research into Energy and Space, from approximately $5 billion and $6 billion in 1980 to around %7 billion and $9.5 billion in 2008, respectively. In contrast, the only field experienced an overall decrease in expenditure was Other Areas, from approximately $7 billion to about $5 billion.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 18, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y on General Science. Starting at about billion in 1980, the government expendit...
^^
Line 3, column 20, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...on General Science. Starting at about billion in 1980, the government expenditure on ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 443, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... billion in 1980 and rising to just over billion by 2008. Meanwhile, there was a...
^^
Line 4, column 108, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nto Energy and Space, from approximately billion and billion in 1980 to around %...
^^
Line 4, column 110, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...o Energy and Space, from approximately billion and billion in 1980 to around %7 billi...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 121, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d Space, from approximately billion and billion in 1980 to around %7 billion and...
^^
Line 4, column 123, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...Space, from approximately billion and billion in 1980 to around %7 billion and .5 bil...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 307, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ture was Other Areas, from approximately billion to about billion.
^^
Line 4, column 309, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...re was Other Areas, from approximately billion to about billion.
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 325, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...as, from approximately billion to about billion.
^^
Line 4, column 327, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
..., from approximately billion to about billion.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 905.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68374111031 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.519337016575 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.9173361682 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.285714286 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8571428571 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 1.69756097561 648% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132081806332 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0693914108995 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0447098102529 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0871334475183 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0336680523863 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.