Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Throughout the history of civilization, we have experienced a significant change in the race. If in the past, it was almost impossible for a woman to convey knowledge in higher institution, now she is able to enroll in various courses as their wish. Some argue that it should be an equivalent proportion of man and woman students in every discipline. This is a very controversial issue, however, I shall hold the opposite opinion.
Firstly, students are merited to choose the major in their interest, not only because they have rights to do so, but also people are likely to achieve higher academic performance when the subject is favored. Secondly, some areas of work and related study are only appropriate for a certain gender. For instance, the occupation of civil engineering seems to fit better for a man than a woman, due to high physical demand.
More importantly, universities should be based on talent and performance, not equal gender opportunity. Balancing between genders may strip away the chance of male and female candidates. A form of natural selection takes place: survival of the fittest. This would encourage all students to strive to meet a place. To remain the ratio of both genders equally, the need for purchasing larger budgets should be conferred either.
In conclusion, I hold the idea that the admission process should not relied on the number of man and woman students. It is essential to stress on the grades or interests so this would be far more advantageous for all of us.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 70, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'should' requires the base form of the verb: 'rely'
Suggestion: rely
...a that the admission process should not relied on the number of man and woman students...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1256.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94488188976 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86720150002 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.637795275591 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 402.3 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4366937724 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.7142857143 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1428571429 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.71428571429 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137003919759 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.041972249359 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0478143705797 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0731169811456 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0325226958609 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.