It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents, for instance for sport or music, and others are not. However, it is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sport person or musician.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
People are dynamic and diverse as everyone has their own interest and strength in a certain field. Giving examples in sport or music, some people believe that athlete or good musician success relate greatly to inherited science – talent, while others argue that skills can be trained.
When it comes to college preference, educators indicate that training has a strong influence on different skills. Many evidences can be found to prove that children are able to acquire a skill with continued training and guided practices.
On the other hand, it is noticeable that innate talent is what differentiates a person who is trained to play a sport or an instrument, with those who become a good player. There is more to the skill than a learned technique, and this extra talent cannot be taught, no matter how good the teacher is or how frequently the children practices.
I personally think that talents give individuals facility for a skill that allow a student to excel, while a hard-working student can never manage to reach a comparable level. But, as with all questions of nature and nurture, they are not mutually exclusive. Good musicians, artist, and exceptional sport stars have probably succeeded because of both good training and natural talent. Without natural talent, continuous training would be neither attractive nor productive, while without good training, the child would not learn how to exploit and develop their talent.
In conclusion, it is the learning process that helps children to acquire a particular skill, but to be really good in areas such as sport, art or music, then some natural talent is required.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 528, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'exploiting'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: exploiting
...ood training, the child would not allow to exploit and develop their talent. In conclusio...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, really, so, then, while, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 41.998997996 57% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1366.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09701492537 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67732656261 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.60447761194 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 417.6 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.0706272534 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.181818182 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3636363636 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.81818181818 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244373918176 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0879372301652 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0631111222349 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134390736736 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0573922227079 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.