The graph below presents the employment patterns in the USA between 1930 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and report in the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words
The line chart illustrates the employment patterns with 5 types in the USA from 1930 to 2010.
Overall, the figure for industrial, sales and office, technical and other services showed an upward trend, whereas that for farming, fishing and foresting declined over the period.
It is clear that the number of labour force in farming, fishing and foresting started at under 80 percent in 1930, it was also the highest rate in 5 types of jobs at the beginning. Then, that decreased gradually to 60 percent in 1970. During 5 years later, that figure experienced a fast falling of 60 percent and reached the lowest point at 0 percent in the last year, 2010.
About the figure for remaining labour force : technical, sales and office, industrial, other services employees increased slightly through 80 years, a rise of approximately 35 percent. The volume of people who worked in industrial and technical were the highest in the last year and exactly the same just under 40 percent. The ratio of sales, office and other services account for 20 percent and 15 percent, respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 211, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eginning. Then, that decreased gradually to 60 percent in 1970. During 5 years la...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, then, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 909.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02209944751 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65136507233 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585635359116 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7100030754 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.625 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.625 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.875 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0700693382207 0.215688989381 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0379765976932 0.103423049105 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0616951141275 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.063825252692 0.15604864568 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0762940664025 0.0819641961636 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.